It is important to remember the ongoing controversial statements of the creator of the

Harry Potter

Franchise. CBR supports the hard work of industry professionals on properties fans know and love, and the wider world of
Harry Potter
that fans have made their own. Find CBR’s ongoing coverage of Rowling here.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 saves the best of the franchise for last. As worlds collide and Muggles are forced to flee, only a handful of resistance fighters remain. The efforts of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix are on a knife edge, paranoia is at its peak, and informants are in positions of power. Harry has never been more important. Deathly Hallows – Part 1 breaks new ground by combining the Muggle and Wizarding worlds, but also by splitting a story into two halves.

The adaptation of the last Harry Potter The novel is in two parts for good reason. This novel benefits from its ability to breathe on screen. Director David Yates juggles numerous storylines and countless character arcs in an indie film-inspired visual style. The film is both fragmented and unfiltered, continuing to strive for originality – although it is guaranteed a guaranteed audience thanks to the enormous popularity of Harry and the Wizarding World.

Structure and style take Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows to a new level – Part 1

The film combines fantasy with realism

• The script for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows It was 500 pages long, which justified the decision to make two films out of it.
• A poster for the play Equusstarring Daniel Radcliffe, appears on the wall of the London café where Harry, Ron and Hermione end up.
• This is the first Harry Potter Film in which JK Rowling is listed as producer.

David Yates has so many facets in mind with this first of two films that the first thing you think about Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 is its structure. The perfect balance between an ever-present threat, important character moments, and integral story elements of the franchise makes the film a true masterclass.

By combining raw and unpretentious real-world locations with sophisticated sound creations, Yates and his team bring genuine realism to their fantastical story. Bare hills, cheap cafes and remote forest clearings bring the world to life. With this approach Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 gradually moves away from the expectations of the Hollywood mainstream and enters new territory. This ethos is also reflected in the three main roles played by actors Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint, who take their characters in new directions.

Harry Potter, Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley are quickly confronted with the reality of Horcrux hunting. Pursued by snatchers and dogged by misinformation, they begin to implode emotionally. Jealousy and distrust begin to change their relationship as Voldemort undermines them from within, due to the locket they wear. With only a small transistor radio to break the silence, these three succumb to cabin fever. Despair creeps in and their situation threatens to tear them apart. A washed-out color palette and handheld imagery accentuate these changes, while long silences underscore the characters’ uncertainty. There are also some similarities between this film and another hugely popular fantasy franchise: JRR Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings.

Comparisons between the highlights of “Deathly Hallows” and “The Lord of the Rings”

Homage plays a crucial role in this Harry Potter film

• The actor Rhys Ifans, who played Xenophilius Lovegood, never had the Harry Potter books, but signed on to the film so he could work with an all-star cast.
• Nagini is a Maledictus – he was once human, but was forced into the form of a snake due to a blood curse.
• A crucial plot point from the book, concerning Tom Riddle’s development into Lord Voldemort, was omitted from the film.

An audience familiar with fantasy novels will recognize the similarities between Harry Potter And Lord of the rings. It makes no difference whether you take a Ring to Mordor or travel across the land with a locket – both objects are filled with unspeakable evil. In either case, unknown forces threaten to drive a psychological wedge between an intrepid trio and disrupt their journey. Screenwriter Steve Kloves sums up this point perfectly in Deathly Hallows – Part 1which shows Voldemort’s increasing influence over Harry, Ron and Hermione as they travel between locations to avoid capture.

Homage is also present in the fundamentals of the story. There are shades of Tolkien in Hermione’s animated retelling of the Deathly Hallows. Visually inspired but intentionally old-fashioned, the sense of history captured in this pivotal moment also offers a seamless portrayal. Not only Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 feels more intimate, but offers the audience an emblem comparable to the Eye of Sauron. However, comparisons between the two franchises go beyond mere symbolism and can be traced back to Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.

Just as Sauron poisons Frodo’s mind against others during his journey, Lord Voldemort tries a similar trick on Harry. With his essence trapped in the locket, Voldemort tries to corrupt, infiltrate, and influence him through mind games – games that initially began as terrifying visions seen through the eyes of Nagini. This evil soon seeks other avenues, taking advantage of Ron’s insecurities and depriving Harry of his last safety net. The comparisons between conflicting wizards are also inevitable.

But nowhere are the parallels more obvious than in the rivalry between Dumbledore and Voldemort. As a mirror image of the conflict between Saruman and Gandalf, it also gives the story its own tension. The rivalry fulfils ambitions that are anything but black and white and leads back to universal themes that the audience can identify with. But aside from reinventing familiar elements, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows takes its own path to the core of human existence – and explores the franchise’s mass appeal in the process.

Universal themes define the Deathly Hallows – Part 1

The film tries to create a deeper connection with the audience

• 13 characters have owned the Elder Wand – also known as the “Wand of Destiny” and “Death Wand” – over the course of their lives.
• Ignotus Peverell was the original owner of the Invisibility Cloak.
• Seven people have used the Resurrection Stone; the first was Cadmus Peverell.

Time is a universal theme that Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 explored with subtlety. This is most evident in the fairy tale itself, where every item in the magical arsenal grants its owner unnatural abilities – whether it be resurrecting loved ones, passing through life unseen, or being widely feared for possessing a weapon of unlimited power that makes them not only infallible but also able to control time itself. The latter is one of humanity’s most enduring preoccupations, and a fascination that every great work of fiction addresses on some level. All of this ties in with the franchise’s themes, such as Harry Potter as a franchise is defined equally by loss and the power of parental love.

Orphaned since early childhood, Harry has no role model, spending his time abandoned by surrogate father figures. Even in this penultimate film, Harry is forced to find his own way to track down a Horcrux, with little more than blind faith. He has brave traits that audiences can identify with beyond the fantasy elements of the film. Yet there is another benefactor who cares for the Boy Who Lived and could potentially prove an invaluable ally.

In addition to the incomparable performance and the flawless structure, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 examines the viewer’s preoccupation with human relationships. Everyone needs to feel wanted, everyone wants more time, but nowhere is loneliness more palpable than in a crowded room. If this film does anything, it is to remind us of the finiteness of all things – including the ability to appreciate the time we have and the people we love. This message is one of the most powerful aspects of an unforgettable film.